Notes on Autism
Quantitative
Electroencephalogram (QEEG) Findings &
Neurofeedback Training
Lynda
Thompson, Ph.D. & Michael Thompson, M.D.
ADD
Centre, Biofeedback Institute of Toronto
www.addcentre.com,
905-803-8066
In the recent research literature on autistic
spectrum disorders, five areas of the brain are
repeatedly found to differ when compared to people
with normal development. Most of these areas are
connected to what is called the mirror-neuron
system. Mirror neurons are groups of neurons that
fire when a person is watching and mentally
mirroring the actions of another person. Young
children learn to mirror and reflect the behaviour
and feelings of others, starting with their mother.
Think of how intently a baby watches its mother’s
face. This mirroring system is crucial for the
young child in order to understand the intentions
and meanings of other people, as expressed through
nonverbal communication. In children with autism,
this mirror neuron system is not functioning
normally (See “Broken Mirrors” in
Scientific American,
by V. S. Ramachandran & L. M. Oberman, 2006).
What is now of great interest is that the lack of
normal functioning in these critical areas of the
brain can be easily seen using a completely
side-effect free and non-invasive procedure called
an electroencephalogram or EEG. The child sits
wearing a cap that has built-in sensors that pick
up electrical activity from the brain and the EEG
is recorded. Later it can be analyzed and one can
see what differs in that child’s patterns in terms
of over-activation (or lack of activation) at
various sites on the scalp and it is also possible
to see if communication between different areas of
the cortex is disrupted (coherence between two
sites that is either too high or two low).
Six main areas of dysfunction in Autism that
can be seen using the EEG are: (1)Amygdala with
connections to the Orbital and Medial Frontal areas
of the brain, (2) the Fusiform gyrus,(3) Superior
Temporal Gyrus with the auditory cortex in the
Temporal lobe, (4) the anterior Insula and the
Anterior Cingulate (both part of the limbic system
(the emotional brain), (5) frontal and
parietal-temporal Mirror Neuron areas, and (6) the
prefrontal cortex .
What is of even more interest is that, once
irregularities in functioning are identified, the
child can do training using a brain-computer
interface that seeks to normalize the brain wave
patterns. The child watches a game-like display
that only moves when they produce the correct
patterns. With enough practice, the brain learns
these healthy patterns and, as the new, more normal
patterns become established the child’s behaviour
also changes.
One of the pictures that can be generated from the
EEG assessment is called a ‘brain map’ and it may
look like the following. This was a nine-year-old
boy diagnosed as autistic. His language development
was at a three-year-old’s level and he made little
eye contact. He would draw a stick figure if
requested, but preferred to draw a repeating
pattern he called a train.

Each
of the circles (labeled 1 – 20 Hz) shows how
much electrical activity there is at a
particular frequency. (Hertz means cycles per
second – the EEG is an alternating current
made up of a mixture of various frequencies.
The equipment used for analysis can separate
out how much power there is in each frequency,
or in a range of frequencies, such as 8 – 12
Hz, which is called alpha.) The red colour
means a very high level of activity. It is in
the right parietal area for the frequencies
from 8 -12 Hz, and this area plays an
important role in processing sensory
information and reading social cues. This is
an important mirror neuron area at the
junction of the parietal and temporal lobes.
Injury in this area from any cause, even a
small bleed (stroke) as might occur in an
adult, may result in the affected person
having great difficulty understanding emotions
and innuendo, such as the hidden meanings in
the other person’s tone of voice or in their
gestures. At 6 Hz on the left side there is a
red spot in the centre between the two frontal
lobes, a site called FZ. Using mathematical
calculations to locate the source of this
activity (a program called LORETA) this slow,
6 cycles per second activity was discovered to
come from a very important area involved with
emotional feelings called the anterior
cingulate. Too much slow wave activity
suggests underactivation and, in an autistic
child, this parallels the symptom of not
appropriately understanding or showing
emotion.
In other brain maps that were done on this child
other frequencies and sites showed up and some of
these findings are discussed below. The next three
pictures are LORETA images. They look like slices
through the brain. It looks very like the pictures
you might expect to see with and fMRI (functional
magnetic resonance imagery) but these pictures are
derived from a mathematical process developed in
Switzerland by Roberto Pasqual-Marqui at the KEY
Institute, Zurich, called Low Resolution
Electromagnetic Tomography – LORETA for short. Each
one shows the area that was the source of some of
the abnormal activity seen on the surface of the
cortex in various brain maps. The anterior
cingulate gyrus is often involved when there are
problems with emotional understanding and /or
emotional regulation. (This not specific to autism
but is also seen in other conditions such as
anxiety disorders.) In the case shown below, the
bright red colour indicates that this child has far
too much fast wave activity (17 cycles per second)
in this area.

The
LORETA image below shows bright red at a very
important ‘mirror neuron site in the left frontal
lobe. This indicates the 20 cycle per second
activity is far too high compared to the normal
data base.

Parents
of children with a diagnosis of autism have
probably heard of the fusiform gyrus. It is an
area of great importance in understanding
facial expressions and it generally is not
functioning normally in these children. The
LORETA image below picks this up very clearly
showing an abnormality at 18 Hz.

Recent
literature has emphasized dysfunction in a
small central nucleus of neurons called the
amygdala. Dysfunction here can mean that the
child cannot correctly interpret the emotions
of other people and it may also mean that they
cannot control their own emotional responses.
They may ignore things or, on the other hand,
they may over-react.
In the LORETA view below, the amygdale is shown to
have far too much of a very slow wave called delta.

In
the brain map shown below is a picture we
frequently see. Here 7 cycles per second is
far above the data base for normals. The area
is nearer to the back of the brain in an
important area for the synthesis and
integration of all sensory (hearing and
vision) information. (Normal would be a solid
green colour rather like the colouring seen at
6, 8 and 9 Hz.) In this brain map, the red
colour means that this child is more than 3
standard deviations outside the normal average
(95 % of the children his age would have less
7 Hz activity at this ‘Pz’ site).

In
each case shown above it is NOT the frequency
(number of waves per second) of the wave that is
most important. What is crucial is the area of the
brain where the electrical activity differs from
normal, the function of that area, and whether the
functions of that area correspond to the
difficulties that particular child is having.
Another critical factor is the way different areas
of the brain communicate with each other and this
is called ‘coherence’. In autistic children it can
be too much or too little communication between
areas, as compared to normal children of the same
age and sex.
In the coherence patterns below (from the same
nine-year-old boy whose brain map was shown first
above) the red lines in the far left circle of the
second diagram (after 40 sessions) show far too
many sites near the back of the brain on the left
side are doing the same kind of activity at the
same time as areas in the frontal lobes (faulty
parietal-frontal connections, especially in the
left hemisphere, which handles most language
functions). In the second circle from the right
there is a light blue line between the left and the
right hemispheres of the brain, meaning too little
communication. Coherence is calculated for
different frequency ranges. Again, a professional
trained in EEG biofeedback can help the child to
normalize this kind of brain activity using special
computer games as feedback, through a learning
process called neurofeedback.
Before
Training:

Progress
Testing after 40 sessions:
Work had been done mainly on beta and theta and he
is now more focused and much less anxious.
Now training will focus on decreasing delta
coherence in the left brain while also teaching
language comprehension.

The
second coherence diagram shown above was based
on EEG measurements done after 40 sessions of
training. Coherence is beginning to normalize
in this nine-year-old boy. Childhood Autism
Rating Scale (CARS) ratings done by parents
have moved from the ‘severely autistic’ range
into the ‘mild to moderately autistic’ range.
He receives special direct instruction in
academic areas and is now doing oral reading
at a second grade level, up from a preprimer
(Kindergarten) level. His training was twice a
week for his first 40 sessions, and he now
does training once a week and continues to
improve.
Research on Autism is taking place on many fronts.
The experience to date using neurofeedback is
encouraging. The application of the findings of
neuroscience research, including recent work on the
mirror neuron system, is perhaps a most exciting
front as it seems to empower the child to make
changes in the way they pay attention and perceive
the world, thus allowing them to get more from
other behavioural and educational approaches. More
research is needed since, to date, it is case
outcomes that have been reported rather than
controlled studies. Those case outcomes are
promising. Training the brain – bringing inactive
areas online and improving communication between
different areas of the cortex using Neurofeedback -
will likely become an important tool in the
tool-kit of interventions for Autistic Spectrum
Disorders.
Further
information may be found in:
Lynda Thompson, Michael Thompson and
Andrea Reid (2010), Functional Neuroanatomy and the
Rationale for Using EEG Biofeedback for Clients
with Asperger’s Syndrome. Applied Pyschophysiology
and Biofeedback, Volume 35, Number 1, March 2010,
pp 39-61